Tuesday, May 5, 2020

HSC Health Maintenance Act of 1973

Question: Describe about theHSC: Health Maintenance Act of 1973. Answer: Background on the HMO Act 1973: The Health Maintenance Act of 1973 which was enacted as a statute in the United States on 29th of December 1973. It is also known as HMO Act; it is a federal law which encourages and promotes the federal trial. The primary founder of the federal HMO Act was Sen. Edward M Kennedy. Principles-It is a team lead by Dr Paul M Ellwood, Jr. The principle motto of HMO Act is to provide and grant loans for start and expand of health organisations. This act provides various assistant such as financial and several others for their promotions. They offer various and comprehensive benefits packages. HMO also provides traditional health insurances for the employees. Thus, it can be stated that the motive of HMO is to develop health organisation system (Sivaramakrishnan Ramanathan, 2013). Zibulewski: EMTALA its means and uses to Physicians: The Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act was passed in the year of 1986 by the US Congress which was a part of (COBRA), the maximum of it was dealt Medicare issues. This was used providing medical care for a patient and to prevent the patient the patient to transfer from private to a public hospital due to financial lack. Its initial and emergency medical condition cover the interpretation by the Health Care Financing Administration, which is presently known today as centres for Medicare and Medicaid Services. This statute now is now potentially applicable to the patient care in the hospital setting. They help all the physicians and hospital staffs to be familiar with all kinds of general requirements. They also help in promoting hospitals with specialised services as per their capacity to treat them (Robinson, 2013). Basics of COBRA: The Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) helps in the health benefit provisions and helps in group health programming. This programming helps the maintaining in the group health program in private sectors which has at least 20 employees or also in state and local governments. Many states have laws similar to that of COBRA (Bacon et al., 2015). It is also said that the law is a plan passed by Federal Government and certain church-related organisations the purpose of COBRA is- Hospital cares for outpatient and inpatient; Care by Physician; Surgery and various other medical benefits; Prescription drugs; Care including dental and vision; Erisa: The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 was enforced on 2nd of September 1974, and it is the codified under the Federal law which establishes a minimum standard of pension plans especially in private industry and also supports the important rules in federal income tax transaction which is related fundamentally to plans for employee benefits. Erisa was mainly established for the protection regarding interest of employee beneficiaries and programs under particular condition- Requiring for the disclosure regarding financial matters and also other information concerning the recipient programs; Establishment of standards for conducting fiduciary plans; Providing of proper remedies about access it in federal courts; The responsibilities enforcement and interpretation of Erisa is classified among the Departments of Labor and Treasury and also in Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation and Internal Revenue Services (Andersen, 2013). Reference List: Andersen, M. B. (2013). Employee Retirement Income Security Act Governed Health Plans Win, Equitable Doctrines Lose: A Look into US Airways v. McCutchen and Its Impact on Future ERISA Litigation. Duq. Bus. LJ, 16, 291. Bacon, D. L., Prater, S. D., Tucker, D. W., Knickerbocker Jr, D. C. (2015). Continuation Coverage Under Group Health Plans (COBRA). Employee Benefits Guide, 1. Robinson, D. I. (2013). The Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) and psychiatric patients in the. Behavioral Emergencies for the Emergency Physician, 320. Sivaramakrishnan, S., Ramanathan, C. S. (2013). 7 Social Security on Health Care. Governance, Development, and Social Work, 36, 129.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.